{"id":2182,"date":"2010-12-19T03:37:19","date_gmt":"2010-12-19T03:37:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/?p=2182"},"modified":"2010-12-19T03:37:19","modified_gmt":"2010-12-19T03:37:19","slug":"rethinking-social-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/2010\/12\/rethinking-social-strategy\/","title":{"rendered":"Rethinking Social Strategy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/farm6.static.flickr.com\/5167\/5202144045_d931239829.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"167\" height=\"250\" \/>I really enjoyed <a onclick=\"javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('\/outgoing\/www.briansolis.com\/2010\/11\/it-takes-a-human-touch-no-really\/');\" href=\"http:\/\/www.briansolis.com\/2010\/11\/it-takes-a-human-touch-no-really\/ \">this post by Brian Solis<\/a> that articulates that social business and social strategy as we\u2019ve been defining it are rooted in ideas that stretch beyond what we\u2019re comfortable with today.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re eager for all-encompassing terms, and we have some<a onclick=\"javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('\/outgoing\/www.stoweboyd.com\/post\/1542867774\/andrew-mcafee-on-social-business-versus-enterprise');\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stoweboyd.com\/post\/1542867774\/andrew-mcafee-on-social-business-versus-enterprise \"> in depth discussions about finding just the right monikers for the upheaval that we\u2019re feeling and experiencing<\/a>. By giving it a name, we can understand it better. Work through its characteristics and nature. Define it in a way that makes it clear for us.<\/p>\n<p>But Brian\u2019s post inspired me to comment on something that I\u2019ve been chewing on for some time, especially as more and more information comes out about what, exactly, a \u201csocial strategist\u201d does, or how we can articulate the nature of a truly social business.<\/p>\n<p>Neither social strategy nor social business can be tucked into a singular definition or layer. They happen at every level of a business, and need to be considered in the appropriate context.<!--more--><\/p>\n<h3>Leadership<\/h3>\n<p>The top layers of an organization often encompass the driving force and vision for the future. Not to say that groundbreaking ideas can\u2019t come from anywhere, but in terms of responsibility, the executive and leadership teams are and should be more concerned with the future of the business than almost anything else. It\u2019s course setting and destination plotting at its finest, and in a social media context, this is where we need to be asking the \u201cWhere do we go next?\u201d question.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s also where culture and intent around social media have to be set, because while culture is created and fostered within the fabric of a company, it is stewarded and endorsed at the top and cannot thrive long term without leadership buy-in (and the patience and cultivation that requires). At this layer, we need social strategy and social business to be designed around that distant view, around translating a vision and illustrating a picture for where we want to go, what we believe to be true, what we hope to impact and change.<\/p>\n<h3>Management<\/h3>\n<p>At the middle levels of an organization, we need shorter term planning (6-12 months) as well as a keen focus on integration and optimization of existing efforts. How can we build systems, people, and processes that not only integrate with each other, but that help realize the vision and ideals we\u2019ve got in our sights for the long term? This is also where we need to <a onclick=\"javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('\/outgoing\/veryofficialblog.com\/2010\/10\/10\/why-we-need-real-social-media-strategists\/');\" href=\"http:\/\/veryofficialblog.com\/2010\/10\/10\/why-we-need-real-social-media-strategists\/\">focus on organizational alignment<\/a> to ensure that everyone is functionally and intellectually moving in the same direction, and devoted to the discussion and education that requires.<\/p>\n<p>In the course of that, the management needs to work with the leadership team to be willing to rethink everything. That can mean <a onclick=\"javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('\/outgoing\/www.newcommbiz.com\/yes-you-do-need-a-social-media-strategy\/');\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newcommbiz.com\/yes-you-do-need-a-social-media-strategy\/\">creating entirely new or reinvented business models<\/a> that are designed to adapt to and around social media, rather than trying to cram what we know and are learning about social into existing and familiar constructs.<\/p>\n<h3>Execution<\/h3>\n<p>I think this is where we end up typically parking \u201csocial strategy\u201d, but it\u2019s one piece of what really is a much greater whole. These are the layers that realize the plan as it\u2019s set out, but the real work in that side of things isn\u2019t just in the delivery. It\u2019s in the testing, the breaking, the mining of that process for learnings and insights that can be fed back into the system and used to improve or rejigger things as needed.<\/p>\n<p>Execution isn\u2019t just doing. It\u2019s doing with the intent to understand what happens when you do. There are few people that can understand the nuances, challenges, unexpected successes and subtle details like those who are charged with actually walking the path. And our social business needs to pervade this layer as much as the leadership realm, lest we disperse our plans and theories to the wild and never truly understand how they worked in practice.<\/p>\n<h3>Reinvention<\/h3>\n<p>I truly believe that capitalizing on social\u2019s power requires rethinking some very fundamental and pivotal ways that we do things, not just the surface treatments that we give them. I don\u2019t have all of the answers yet for what that means or how it looks. But I\u2019m thinking about it, I\u2019m writing about it, I\u2019m contemplating. I don\u2019t think social is the only and sole answer. What I *do* think, however, is that social is the catalyst in many ways for re-examining our own assumptions around how all of the elements of our business work best.<\/p>\n<p>The trick for most business is that instead of building on a new foundation, we have to reverse engineer some of the things we\u2019re already doing. And that\u2019s messy. Some we have to start doing, from scratch. Some we have to do differently or better. Some we have to stop doing altogether. All of those things have implications from how people work to what they do to how they feel and what value they provide, and changing them can have some repercussions that aren\u2019t always easy to handle.<\/p>\n<p>Change that endures requires not just obstinate persistence, but methodical and patient stewardship. And the evolution of social strategy for a business needs to take place, in parallel, in many different areas. They need not all continue or change at the same rate, but significant movement in some areas but not others is what creates friction and discord. I think that\u2019s a large part of what we\u2019re feeling now; some areas of social business emerging faster than others, likely ones that are more closely aligned with what we already know and understand while the more difficult aspects of culture change and fluid communication are less clear (and as a result, move much more slowly as we unravel them).<\/p>\n<p>There is much to consider, and it\u2019s going to take some bravery on the part of businesses and the leaders that guide them.<\/p>\n<p>How to make it all work together, in concert? What does that new business model look like? That continues to be our ultimate question, and the one for which I don\u2019t yet have complete answers. But I\u2019m finding pieces. And perseverance cannot be underestimated.<\/p>\n<p>Amber Naslund<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I really enjoyed this post by Brian Solis that articulates that social business and social strategy as we\u2019ve been defining it are rooted in ideas that stretch beyond what we\u2019re comfortable with today. We\u2019re eager for all-encompassing terms, and we have some in depth discussions about finding just the right monikers for the upheaval that &#8230; <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/2010\/12\/rethinking-social-strategy\/\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[137,55],"tags":[133,895,896,30,897,898,899],"class_list":["post-2182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-posts","category-ambernaslund","tag-brian-solis","tag-shannon-paul","tag-social-business","tag-social-media","tag-social-media-strategy","tag-stowe-boyd","tag-tac-anderson"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2182"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2186,"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2182\/revisions\/2186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thesocialcmo.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}